Raanan Katz, RK Centers Claim RK Plazas Have Limited Public Access

Do businesses, leasing from RK TOWN CENTERS, know that Raanan Katz, his son Daniel Katz, and their "SHOPPING PLAZAS" prevent customers from entering businesses, including Bank of America, TD Bank, CVS Pharmacy, Walgreens, Publics, UPS and etc, at Raanan Katz and RK Centers own discression. At this time Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz claim in the court that RK SHOPPING PLAZAS and TOWN CENTERS have limited public access. I am not even mentioning that this Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz claim violates prior court order entered in 2009 and settlement agreement.

Well, subpoenas submitted to the businesses, such as Bank of America. TD Bank, CVS Pharmacy, Walgreens, Publics, UPS and others, will clear up whether the businesses are aware of Raanan Katz and RK Centers activities of harassing customers  of their tenants (I am not only talking about myself, my family and anyone associated with me, but also John Doe, who is practically might be any customer entering the businesses leasing from Raanan Katz and CO).
Logical question, what type of money could compensate damages caused by Raanan Katz actions. I am not even talking that Raanan Katz and his claimed to be SHOPPING CENTERS interfere into the business relationship between tenants and their customers. But who cares about people, businesses, matters of public interest and constitutionally protected freedom of speech, when Raanan business with his common area and automatic lease renewal is the first priority. What type of compensation will be available to the customers and businesses once appeal reversed JUDGE Leesfield unconstitutional, unlawful at the best order???
In the meantime, Katz and his attorneys, Alan Kluger and Todd Levine of Miami based Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen, Levine law firm, can celebrate the VICTORY. But..Not for a long time.

 Raanan Katz and Daniel Katz bring the following argument to the appeal court in the motion for extension of time. By the way, Katzes like taking extensions only in federal and appeal courts, in Judge Leesfield court their motions are emergency and go first priority (probably by accident).

"As his grounds for conditioning consent to this extension upon a stay of the injunction, counsel for the appellant claimed that the injunction prevents the appellant (mine clarification:blogger, all associated, as well as any member of the public) from entering the appellees' properties, thereby preventing the appellant from conducting activities such as banking or grocery shopping, and that the injunction also result in a denial of the appellant's freedom of speech.
However, the appellees (mine:Raanan Katz, Daniel Katz, RK Centers) have no monopoly upon all bank branches, grocery stores, or any other commercial establishments. The appellant is free to frequent any such establishments in South Florida or elsewhere as long as they are not managed by the appellees. Thus, at worst, the injunction poses to the appellant, as the trial court characterized it, a "potential inconvenience" until the matter is tried on the merits. The appellants inconvenience is far outweighed by the irreparable harm and danger to the appellees."
What type of danger Raanan Katz is talking about?

This was filed by LAW OFFICES OF PAUL Morris, P.A. 9350 South Dixie Highway, Suite 1450 Miami, FL 33156
(305) 670-1441 Florida Bar No. 193769 together with well known Miami law firm  of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen and Levine.

Raanan Katz message seems very clear: "pay rent and whatever I ask you to pay, but you are not allowed to do the business..." Censorship and business destruction should not be allowed on Raanan Katz request in Miami, as Miami is still part of the United States of America. What type of freedom we have in Miami if we have to fight for basic things?
In the meantime, I can just enjoy watching meaning of freedom outside of Miami.