UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ruled on
Raanan Katz Motion for Protective Order in part related to Mr. Katz
request to "seal" his deposition transcript in the CASE NO. 12-2221
I-CIV-KING/M CALILEY.
In this case Raanan Katz alleged copyright
violation related to his "unflattering" picture. Judge ordered filing
of the transcript with the court records by June 12, 2013, and "under
seal" request was denied. This means that new details of the case could
be revealed by the end of next week. Here is the extraction from the
Court order.
"Also pending is Plaintiffs (Raanan Katz) Motion
for Protective Order, in which he requests, among other things, that the
Court enter a protective order requiring that his deposition transcript
be filed
under seal. (DE 50, p. 102.)..
I have carefully
reviewed Plaintiffs (Raanan Katz) motion for protective order and
exhibits, and have considered it in light of Judge King's prior order
denying the parties' joint motion for protective order. (DE 23). I find
that Plaintiff (Raanan Katz) has not shown good cause for entering a
protective order requiring that his transcript be filed under seal. See
Fed. R. Civ.P, 26(c)(1) (good cause required for protective order); In re Alexander
Grant & Co. Litig.,820 F.2d 352, 355-57 (1 1th Cir. 1987) (although
the public has no First Amendment right of access to pretrial discovery
materials, the parties must show good cause for a protective order);
S.D. Fla. Local Rule 5.4(a) ("Unless
otherwise provided by law, Court rule or Court order, proceedings in the
United States District Court are public and Court Filings are matters
of public record.'').
No comments:
Post a Comment