RK Centers, Raanan Katz company, 18100 Collins
Avenue Shopping Center, LTD, a Florida limited Partnership, filed legal
action for DAMAGES against it’s commercial Tenant in Miami Court Case
2013-1486-CA-01 on January 14, 2013.
The same day the Defendants (the tenant and
guarantor) were served with the pleadings (per court records). For some
reason the Defendants have not responded to the complaint that gave RK
Centers company green light to go straight to default.
What is the most amazing is the amount of the damages claimed and granted per default judgment $504,336.64
Here is the extraction from the order:
“1. 18100 Collins Avenue Shopping Center, LTD., a
Florida Limited Partnership, shall recover from Copper Chimney, Inc., a
Florida Corporation, the sum of $369.247.86, as principal, that shall
bear interest at the statutory rate, and, in addition, 18100 Collins
Avenue Shopping Center, LTD, shall recover prejudgment interest in the
amount of $2,017.68, for the period of January 14, 2013 through the
estimated date of the entry of this judgment, February 25, 2013,
totaling $371,265.54, for which let execution issue forthwith.
2. 18100 Collins Avenue Shopping Centers, LTD
shall recover from and Jasmine Uberoi, Individually as Guarantor, the
sum of $132,347.86, as principal, that shall bear interest at the
statutory rate, and, in addition, 18100 Collins Avenue Shopping Center,
LTD. shall recover prejudgment interest in the amount of $723.24, for
the period of January 14, 2013 through the estimated date of the entry
of this judgment, February 25, 2013, totaling $133,071.10, for which let execution issue forthwith.”
On February 7, 2013 RK Centers and Raanan Katz
company filed affidavit in support of motion for summary judgment based
on which the DEFAULT was granted.
What is the amount of monthly rent the Tenant was
responsible for and how many months the rent was not paid to get
$504,336.64 in default damages?
I could not find non-default cases where RK
Centers, Raanan Katz and his companies were able to prove the amount of
damages they claimed in the initial complaint.
No comments:
Post a Comment